When Victims Rule. A Critique of Jewish Pre-eminence in America

The above links are in html. When Victims Rule is also now available in pdf format also.

This site is dedicated to a pan-human, universalistic, non-violent, anti-hate, and anti-racist world view.
It supports free speech and public discussion about controversial issues.
It argues against international bullies and all forms of Thought Police.
It seeks justice, proportionate balance, and fairness for all people.
It investigates hypocrisy, bigotry, and dual moral standards.
It argues that all sides of any issue should be known.

Is this site "anti-Semitic?"

Click on PART 1 and then PART 2 of an investigation into how virtually anyone and anything
is considered by popular Jewish convention to be anti-Semitic, and how this all-encompassing
smear of irrational bigotry is used to ward off all morally justifiable criticism of
Jewish-inspired injustice and Israel.

Criticism of the powerful is not immoral. It is a necessary part of any truly open society.

"There is a principal which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance -- that principal is contempt prior to investigation."
--Herbert Spencer

QUESTION #1:

Is the profoundly disproportionate social, cultural, economic,
and political influence upon America and the western world
by a small, largely ethnocentric, international minority
group healthy for democracy? And is it healthy,
ultimately, for the minority itself?

QUESTION #2:

What elephant in the living room? Do you mean
the one we're forbidden to talk about?

THE PAST:

"Over representation in the economic elite of a visible ethnic minority of the degree found in Poland and Hungary was certain to cause trouble regardless of the identity of the group: if Belgians, Bulgarians, or Bolivians had constituted 62 per cent of the highest income-earners of Hungary, rather than Jews, that would certainly engendered resentment against them ... To us [Jews], European antisemitism appears to be a weapon of the strong against the weak, a kind of ideological sadism. To European right-wing nationalists of the post-1870 period, however, antisemitism appeared to be a weapon of the weak against the strong, an attempt (as they saw it) by a downtrodden nation to regain control over its resources from a separate, distinctive minority which appeared to dominate the economy -- an aim not unlike that of anti-colonial movements in the Third World vis-a-vis the Europeans and foreign entrepreneurial minorities (like the Chinese throughout South-East Asia). The Zionist movement understood this perfectly well, however disturbing such a perspective may seem to us viewed with post-Holocaust eyes.

Moreover, research is most likely to demonstrate a very considerable actual Jewish over-representation in many other social and political areas which figured largely in the litany of continental antisemitism of the post-1870 period, especially Jewish participation in the radical left, the liberal professions, in journalism, and in the media."

-- W. D. Rubinstein, Jewish Journal of Sociology, Vol. 42, nos. 1 and 2, 2000, p. 18-19

The Present:

Follow the blue "Open Book" button above, or click here, to read the book When Victims Rule. A Critique of Jewish Pre-eminence in America, a clearinghouse for information featuring over 10,000 citations from about 4,000 (scholarly and mainstream media) bibliographic sources.

The Jewish Tribal Review: a compilation of links to online
articles (largely from the mainstream media and Jewish ethnic sources) about Jewish influence in popular culture, Jewish power, Jewish ethnocentrism, Jewish wealth, Jewish power, Jewish ethnocentrism, Judaism, Jewish racism, Jewish political lobbying, Israel, and Zionism..

No one's citation on these pages should be understood as an endorsement of other statements at this site.
This site is a non-profit educational clearinghouse for information.

This page was created at a monitor resolution of 800 X 600, and is configured this way.
Copyright policy? The independent web site, Ukrainian Archive, says it best.